The Supreme Court has asked the Central Pollution Control Board to conduct scientific studies and obtain data on the pollution caused by stone crushing units and state if they …
The minimum distance between two stone crusher units should be 1 km to avoid dust pollutional influence of one over the other. 14. It is not disputed by the appellant...the B.P. Ms. No.4 dated 2.7.2004 which insists a clear distance of 1 km between two stone crushers to avoid dust pollution influence of one over the other.
Out of the 210 stone-crusher units violating siting criteria, 106 units have obtained interim protection from the Supreme Court and the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
Kumaon Stone Crusher. November 26, 2021. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004. Learned counsel for the parties submit that in some of these matters …
The Supreme Court has held what may not be done under the provisions of the Act may not be permitted to be done by invoking under Article 226. Article 226 is not meant to avoid or circumvent the process of the law and the provisions of the statute.
EPCA was informed that after the Hon'ble Supreme Court directive of May 2002, the stone crushers were not being operated, except between the hours of 5 am to 9 am.
and basic activity for the stone crushing units. Therefore this kind of industrial units need scrutiny while granting permission for environmental and mining operations, especially at the time of NOC (i.e. Consent to Establishment) stage. It should
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/s. Jai Shree Ram Stone Crusher (I) Pt. Ltd, Nainital v. DCIT, Nainital on CaseMine.
If you strive for to download and install the How To Make A Stone Crusher, it is unquestionably easy then, in the past currently we extend the colleague to purchase and create bargains to download and install How To Make A …
The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a controversial settlement that would have sent billions of dollars to treatment programs and victims of the nation's opioid epidemic but …
crusher units, as mentioned in the report of the Joint
Petitioner (s) VERSUS M/S. KUMAON STONE CRUSHER Respondent (s) (With appln. For impleadment as party respondent and c/delay in filing counter affidavit and exemption from filing O.T., and modification of Court's order) WITH SLP (C) No. 24889/2004 (With Interim Relief) SLP (C) No. 23547/2005 (With appln.
Judgment dated 12.4.2023 of the High Court of Bombay - No distinction between Stone quarrying and Stone crusher to protect environment of Sanctuary.
Closure of stone crushers leaves labour high and dry. ON MAY 15 this year, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement in response to a public interest suit demanding the closure of the 300-odd stone-crushing units in and around New Delhi. Unlicensed units were immediately closed and the rest are to be shut down by August 15.
Kumaon Stone Crusher _____ Respondent. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19445/2004, decided on February 19, 2015 (With appln. For impleadment as party respondent and c/delay in filing counter affidavit and exemption from filing O.T., and modification of Court's order) With ...
As the matter involves a short question which is in dispute between the parties, we propose to dispose of this Application at this stage. After perusing the materials on record, including the joint inspection report filed by CPCB along with the policy of the State Government, we pass the following directions:
2. Case of the applicant is that the stone crusher is on natural...water spring, at a distance of 3-4 mtrs which is a prohibited distance. Permission to set up new stone crusher has been granted on 17.06.2019 by the Director of Industries, Himachal Pradesh.
5. A Seven Judge Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in India Cement Ltd. and others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and others, (1990)1 Supreme Court Cases 12, has declared that …
Kumaon Stone Crusher vs. State of Uttarakhand, submits that boulders crushed into grits retain same characteristic that is forest produce. By obtaining grits, stone chips and dust …
The counsel for petitioner Sampat Anand Shetty says that the authorities have been permitting stone crushing units though there was a specific direction by the high court to close down all such ...
No stone crusher shall operate in the above said area form August 15, 1992 onward. (3) The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in Delhi High Court which have been transferred to this Court shall stand dismissed with no order as to costs.
Ravinder Saini. Mahendragarh, March 2. Hearing an appeal filed by owners of stone crushers operating in Mahendragarh and Charkhi Dadri districts against the National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders ...
The court also directed to ensure tree plantation at the areas affected from stone crushing at Margalla Hills besides issuing directives to ensure tree plantation on the roadsides of Express ...
The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 26-6-2007 passed by Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 993 of 2004 ( M/B) M/s Gupta Builders v. State of Uttaranchal No order as to costs.
Get free access to the complete judgment in STATE OF UTTARANCHAL v. M/S. KUMAON STONE CRUSHER on CaseMine.
Writ Petitions were filed before this Court, challenging the action of the owners/proprietors of the stone-crushers whereby stone-dust and smoke was allowed to pass into the air, …
Petitioner :- Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Udit Chandra,Nitesh Patel
Recently, the Allahabad High Court in the matter of Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company v. State of U.P. and Anr., has held that in a civilized society, principles of natural justice ought to be followed in order to maintain rule of law.
On 15 September 2017, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) delivered a judgment in the matter of State of Uttarakhand v Kumaon Stone Crusher [1] deciding the issue of levy of ...
The Himachal Pradesh High Court issued Notices to the Chief Secretary, Principal Secretary (forest), State Pollution Control Board, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Kangra Deputy Commissioner, and Jwalamukhi Sub-divisional Magistrate in a case involving the installation of a Stone Crusher.
Sri Singh has placed reliance on the judgments of the Supreme Court in the case of State of Gujarat and another v. Jayeshbhai Kanjibhai Kalathiya11, and Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State Of Uttar Pradesh and others12.
Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As per the office report, the notice to the respondent No.8 is returned unserved.
Order of the Supreme Court of India in the matter of M/S Shree Ganesh Stone Crusher & Others Vs The State of Haryana & Others dated 02/11/2020. The matter relates to an interim order passed by the National Green Tribunal (NGT), directing prosecution and compensation proceedings to be initiated for damaging the environment …
Implementation Challenges of Environmental Guidelines in the Stone Crusher Industry. Fugitive emissions, though a substantial contributor to air pollution of the area, have always been overlooked while preparing action plans to combat air pollution. Stone crushers are identified as one such sector with high potential for fugitive dust …
Supreme Court throws out multi-billion dollar settlement with Purdue over opioid crisis Most victims supported the settlement with Purdue Pharma.
Kumaon Stone Crusher vs. State of Uttarakhand, submits that boulders crushed into grits retain same characteristic that is forest produce. By obtaining grits, stone chips and dust no new material is obtained. Challenging …
Mr M.C Mehta — environmentalist lawyer — has filed this public interest petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Haryana Pollution Control Board (the Board) to control the pollution caused by the stone crushers, pulverisers and mine operators in the Faridabad-Balabgarh area.
